WebThe case of Roop Kumar v. Mohan Thedani (2003) revolves around the scope and ambit of Sections 91, and 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 that deals with ldquo;How much of information received from accused may be provedrdquo; is nothing but a proviso to Section 25 and 26 of the Act, as has been ... WebJan 19, 2001 · Mohan Thedani is a tenant in respect of premises No. 15A/16 (Shop No. 1), Ajmal Khan Road, New Delhi at a monthly rent of Rs. 2,000/-. The said shop was registered …

Roop Kumar v. Mohan Thedani - Casemine

WebIn recent decisions i.e. Bhavnagar University v. patina Sugar Mill Pvt. Ltd., (2002) AIR SCW 4939 and Roop Kumar v. Mohan Thedani , (2003) 3 SCALE 611 the view in the said case was reiterated Statements of fact as to what transpired at the hearing recorded in the judgment of the court, are conclusive of the facts so stated and no one can ... WebJan 19, 2001 · Roop Kumar v/s Mohan Thedani Regular First Appeal No. 77 of 1997 Decided On, 19 January 2001 At, High Court of Delhi By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN … tenth day of the seventh month

SSRN Id2146713 PDF PDF Evidence Precedent - Scribd

WebApr 16, 2004 · Roop Kumar v. Mohan Thedani 2003 3 Scale 611 the view in the said case was reiterated. Statements of fact as to what transpired at the hearing recorded.... AIR 1966 SC 1113, L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India 1997 3 SCC 261 and recently in... Eastern Coalfields v. Joscon . 5 Court: Supreme Court Of India Date: Jul 31, 2003 Cited By: 2 … WebOct 31, 2024 · Relying on Roop Kumar v Mohan Thedani which had elaborately explained the import of S.91 and S.92 of the Evidence Act, the Court noted that: "When persons express … WebApr 16, 2004 · Palitana Sugar Mill (P) Ltd. 2003 2 SCC 111 and Roop Kumar v. Mohan Thedani 2003 6 SCC 595.] 10. Even otherwise, the plea that the medical evidence is contrary to the ocular evidence has also no substance. It is merely based on the purported opinion expressed by an author. tenthdays shop reviews