Cunningham v. laser golf corp. 222 f.3d 943
WebAug 29, 2006 · The district court's evidentiary decisions are reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Owens, 424 F.3d 649, 653 (7th Cir.2005); United States v. … WebMar 14, 2024 · See Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corp., 222 F.3d 943, 55 USPQ2d 1842, 1846 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (“Regarding descriptive terms, this court has noted that the ‘descriptive component of a mark may be given little weight in reaching a conclusion on the likelihood of confusion.’”) (quoting In re Nat’l Data Corp., 753 F.2d 1056, 224 USPQ 749, …
Cunningham v. laser golf corp. 222 f.3d 943
Did you know?
WebCunningham v. Laser Golf Corp., 222 F.3d 943, 950, 55 USPQ2d 1842, 1847 (Fed. Cir. 2000); In re Cox Enters., 82 USPQ2d 1040, 1044 (TTAB 2007) . The rights associated … WebAug 14, 2000 · Research the case of Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corporation, from the Federal Circuit, 08-15-2000. AnyLaw is the FREE and Friendly legal research service …
WebSee Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corp., 222 F.3d 943, 55 USPQ2d 1842, 1844 (Fed. Cir. 2000); King Candy Co. v. Eunice King’s Kitchen, 496 F.2d 1400, 182 USPQ 108, 110 (CCPA 1974). III. Likelihood of Confusion Our determination under Section 2(d) is based on an analysis of all of the relevant, WebWisconsin Department of Transportation
WebJan 18, 2013 · See, e.g., Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corp., 222 F.3d 943, 55 USPQ2d 1842, 1844 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (party’s ownership of pleaded registration establishes standing). In addition, because opposer’s pleaded registrations are of record, priority is not an issue with respect to the services covered by opposer’s pleaded registrations. Penguin Books ... Web222 F.3d 943: Party Name: TOM CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. LASER GOLF CORPORATION (now known as BelAir Golf), Appellee. Case Date: August 15, 2000: …
WebAug 15, 2000 · Laser Golf filed a petition to cancel Cunningham's registration and the Board granted the petition, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1052 (d) (section 2 (d) of the Lanham …
WebSee Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corp., 222 F.3d 943, 55 USPQ2d 1842, 1846 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (“Regardin g descriptive terms, this court has noted that the ‘descriptive … fg 21/3 fcaWebCunningham v. Laser Golf Corp., 222 F.3d 943, 55 USPQ2d 1842, 1844 (Fed. Cir. 2000). Opposer also sufficiently alleged likelihood of confusion under Trademark Act Section … fg21/3 fcaWebJan 18, 2024 · Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corp., 222 F.3d 943, 945–46 (Fed. Cir. 2000); ... Cunningham, 222 F.3d at 945–46. Such grounds include fraud in procuring trademark registration, which occurs when an applicant knowingly makes a false, material representation of fact in connection with a registration application with the intent to … dentists in peachtree city gafg220wWebJul 27, 2024 · Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corp., 222 F.3d 943, 945 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). Statutory standing is a question of "whether a legislatively conferred cause of action encompasses a particular plaintiff's claim." ... A reasonable belief in damage "can be shown by establishing a direct commercial interest," Cunningham, 222 F.3d at … fg21m21 cprWebAug 15, 2000 · 222 F.3d 943 (Fed. Cir. 2000) TOM CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. LASER GOLF CORPORATION (now known as BelAir Golf), Appellee. 99-1585. United States … fg22/5 fcaWebNov 8, 2007 · Said sum shall be paid with 12% interest pursuant to T.C.A. § 36-5-101 (f) (1) from December 3, 2002 through March 31, 2003, in the amount of $1,560.52, for a total … fg24512 choco see